A century-old study is still affecting doctor-patient trust today.
The health disparities in the United States stem from a number of factors. Systemic obstacles to health care can make good care less accessible to vulnerable populations, lack of insurance coverage can make it unaffordable, and a mistrust in the healthcare system can make Black Americans hesitant to visit their doctors at all.
The mistrust in the healthcare system—and even in individual physicians—has a complex history. White physicians may carry implicit cultural biases that make Black patients feel misunderstood, unheard, or neglected. To make it worse, only 5 percent of active physicians in the U.S. are Black or African American, according to the Association of American Medical Colleges.
But it’s not simply present-day treatment of Black Americans that shapes the doctor-patient relationship. “There’s one very big blemish in our nation’s history when it comes to our research on Black patients,” says Sanjai Sinha, MD, internist at Weill Cornell Medicine. “Between 1930 and 1970, there was a famous study called the Tuskegee Syphilis Study.”
The Tuskegee Syphilis Study
Today’s medical studies demand following specific standards to keep human subjects safe. For example, if you are testing a new medication, your human subjects must give informed consent (meaning you have told them the purpose and extent of the study), and the study must be ethical. Before testing can begin, the study must get approval by Institutional Review Boards (IRB).
But this process didn’t go into effect until the 1970s. It was a direct response to a study called the “Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male.”
The study began on the wrong foot right away when researchers told the Black men (who were low-income sharecroppers in Alabama) that they were being “treated” for “bad blood.” In reality, the researchers were not providing any treatment at all. The researchers also told the men that the study would last just six months, but it stretched for 40 years.
When news broke of the study in 1972, it obviously appalled the public. Further investigation revealed that the men had consented to the study, but the researchers had severely misled them about the purpose of the study. In other words, the participants did not provide informed consent.
Thanks to the investigation, study stopped immediately, a class-action lawsuit was filed, and a benefit program began to provide reparations for any living participants, as well as their wives and offspring.
The Lasting Effects of the Study
While you certainly can’t blame all of today’s health disparities on this one study, it became a symbol of a system that was neglecting and objectifying Black lives.
“Because of this very unethical research on Black men, it’s not very much of a stretch to understand why the Black community … has a grave mistrust of the healthcare system. That kind of history doesn’t die quickly,” says Dr. Sinha.
Today, physicians like Dr. Sinha are working to understand how to improve doctor-patient relationships for Black patients, cultural competency among physicians, and accessibility to healthcare facilities.
The goal? Reduce the factors, biases, and obstacles that lead to higher rates of certain diseases among Black Americans. Learn more about what healthcare facilities are doing today to connect vulnerable populations.
00:00:00.100 --> 00:00:01.866
(somber piano music)
00:00:01.867 --> 00:00:04.499
What are some of the historical factors that have engendered
00:00:04.500 --> 00:00:07.199
this lack of trust between physicians and patients?
00:00:07.200 --> 00:00:10.366
Yeah, there's one very big blemish in our nation's history
00:00:10.367 --> 00:00:15.366
when it comes to our research on Black patients.
00:00:15.367 --> 00:00:21.532
Earlier in this century, and this has built a lot of the mistrust that now exists today.
00:00:21.533 --> 00:00:24.600
(somber piano music)
00:00:26.400 --> 00:00:29.399
Earlier in the 1900s between 1930 and 1970,
00:00:29.400 --> 00:00:32.466
there was a famous study called the Tuskegee Syphilis Study,
00:00:32.467 --> 00:00:35.466
and it was commissioned by the U.S. Public Health Service
00:00:35.467 --> 00:00:38.699
in collaboration with Tuskegee University in Alabama,
00:00:38.700 --> 00:00:45.632
and the objective of the study was to follow men with syphilis
00:00:45.633 --> 00:00:49.699
and to understand the natural history of what syphilis can do to you
00:00:49.700 --> 00:00:51.599
without offering any treatment.
00:00:51.600 --> 00:00:54.899
This was completely unethical because treatment became available in the 1940s.
00:00:54.900 --> 00:00:56.432
Because what kind of men were these?
00:00:56.433 --> 00:01:00.232
These were poor, Black men in Alabama.
They were sharecroppers.
00:01:00.233 --> 00:01:02.466
They recruited about 600 of these men,
00:01:02.467 --> 00:01:04.732
and told them the study was gonna last 6 months.
00:01:04.733 --> 00:01:06.932
It lasted 40 years,
00:01:06.933 --> 00:01:10.099
and they followed these patients to see what would happen
00:01:10.100 --> 00:01:12.632
to them with untreated syphilis.
00:01:12.633 --> 00:01:16.199
All kinds of skin problems, then they would have cardiac problems
00:01:16.200 --> 00:01:19.132
and neurologic problems and eventually death.
00:01:19.133 --> 00:01:21.899
Yet, by the '40s, they had penicillin,
00:01:21.900 --> 00:01:25.132
which was still to this day the number one treatment for syphilis,
00:01:25.133 --> 00:01:29.766
but they didn't offer it to them because they wanted
to learn about the natural history.
00:01:29.767 --> 00:01:32.399
It was an awful, awful moment in our history.
00:01:32.400 --> 00:01:35.032
It didn't even become public until 1972,
00:01:35.033 --> 00:01:38.532
and when it became public, it shut down.
00:01:38.533 --> 00:01:42.466
Because of this very unethical research on Black men,
00:01:42.467 --> 00:01:46.432
it's not very much of a stretch to understand why the Black community,
00:01:46.433 --> 00:01:48.766
Black men in particular, but the Black community,
00:01:48.767 --> 00:01:51.899
has a grave mistrust of the healthcare system.
00:01:51.900 --> 00:01:56.499
That kind of history doesn't die quickly.
00:01:56.500 --> 00:02:00.332
Because of that horrible, horrible event, seven years later,
00:02:00.333 --> 00:02:05.699
the United States took action in protecting human subjects
in all kinds of research,
00:02:05.700 --> 00:02:10.599
and to this day, they have continued to regulate very heavily
00:02:10.600 --> 00:02:15.399
any trial in America that involves studying human beings,
00:02:15.400 --> 00:02:21.632
even if it's not directly involving a human subject taking medicine, if you will,
00:02:21.633 --> 00:02:25.732
if it's just looking at their charts to understand
their medical problems and treatments,
00:02:25.733 --> 00:02:28.899
all of that has to go through an Institutional Review Board,
00:02:28.900 --> 00:02:34.166
at every academic medical center and drug company in the country
00:02:34.167 --> 00:02:39.566
because of this lack of consent that patients didn't have in the Tuskegee trial
00:02:39.567 --> 00:02:43.899
and the inability for the right thing to be done for so many years.
00:02:43.900 --> 00:02:48.432
These days, if you're tested, the effect of the medicine,
00:02:48.433 --> 00:02:52.966
if it shows to be very effective, significantly shown in a study,
00:02:52.967 --> 00:02:55.866
anywhere in the world, they stop the study right then and say,
00:02:55.867 --> 00:03:00.132
'We can't any longer not give this medicine to the people
00:03:00.133 --> 00:03:03.432
in the study who are receiving a treatment that is a placebo
00:03:03.433 --> 00:03:06.466
because that's unethical. We now know that this is effective.'
00:03:06.467 --> 00:03:09.032
That wasn't done in Tuskegee, and that I think created
00:03:09.033 --> 00:03:11.966
an enormous amount of mistrust, and as we said earlier,
00:03:11.967 --> 00:03:14.499
when you have mistrust, why should you listen to us?
00:03:14.500 --> 00:03:15.899
Why should you come to me?
00:03:15.900 --> 00:03:19.966
And so one of the things that we're also trying to do is say,
well, who do you trust?
00:03:19.967 --> 00:03:22.766
And how do we connect with the people that you trust?
00:03:22.767 --> 00:03:28.932
And how do we better convey information now in 2019 today,
00:03:28.933 --> 00:03:31.932
where we are just trying to give you the best information
that we have available,
00:03:31.933 --> 00:03:34.266
it doesn't matter what your ethnicity is,
00:03:34.267 --> 00:03:38.666
but we want you to trust that we're not trying to experiment on you.
00:03:38.667 --> 00:03:41.832
And that we offer this treatment to everyone.
00:03:41.833 --> 00:03:43.267
(somber piano music)
- Diversity in medicine: facts and figures 2019. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges. (Accessed on June 15, 2020)
- Regulations: good clinical practice and clinical trials. Washington, DC: U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2019. (Accessed on June 15, 2020)
- The Tuskegee timeline. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2020. (Accessed on June 15, 2020)